Conflicts are fairly common in the
work place and in settings where individuals are required to work in groups. As
I mentioned in earlier blog posts, it is extremely important to understand the
key components of an organizational structure to avoid conflict, and in some
cases, conflict may be unavoidable. Miscommunication, personal differences,
difference of opinion and many other factors contribute to the break down of
group structures, causing conflict. I’ve described several situations, in which
I’ve worked in a group setting to achieve a common goal, successfully, and now
I would like to illustrate an example of a conflict, and how it was handled.
Back in high school I worked at
Carson’s as a shoe salesman. This was the first job I ever held and each day I
learned something new about customer service, handling money and sales.
Although the job wasn’t group orientated by nature, all the sales people helped
each other out whenever possible. This may seem counter intuitive, because each
person was paid on commission and it is in everyone’s best financial interest
to only focus on his or her sales. One day while I was working a customer
requested that I help her sort though some shoes on the shoe rack. Each time
she found a shoe she liked I went in the back storage room to find and retrieve
the shoe’s mate. On one instance I could not find the shoe that matched the
mate the customer was interested in finding. I went to the costumer to deliver
the bad news at which point she began to yell and demand that I bring her the
shoe. I tried my best to calm to customer down, but at one point I said, “ I
don’t know what else to tell you, the shoe was lost – I am sorry”. She
continued to yell and demanded to speak with my manager. After yelling and explaining the situation to
my manager she simply ran off and left the store.
Fortunately for me, my manager was
not upset and completely understood the situation. This conflict stemmed from
lack of communication and was my fault. My manager was able to look at both
sides of the situation and pinpoint exactly what went wrong and what could have
been done to improve the situation. From my perspective, I could not understand
why the woman didn’t simply accept that the shoe lost. However, what I failed
to do what share the information that I had with her. I should have told her
that the back storage room is extremely disorganized in regards to sale items.
The sale items are often older models, returns or defective and it extremely
common for shoes to inadvertently get thrown away - this is why we offer those shoes at such
low prices. I strongly believe that if I explained that portion of the
situation she would have understood and stopped yelling. Secondly, having a
weak background in sales and customer service I should have offered her a
discount on another pair she liked, or given her some other gift for her
inconvenience. For whatever reason,
giving her a gift next crossed my mind.
From the shopper’s perspective, I
imagine she held the mentality of “ the customer is always right.” From the outside
looking in, stores often look like tightly run corporate entities, but often
they are mismanaged and operate only as well as the workers who run them. The
woman clearly held one of the shoes in her hand and could not possible image
that the other shoe was not located somewhere in the back. It simply made no sense
to her. I am sure the woman had many other things on her mind and didn’t take
the time to realize that losing a shoe isn’t that big of a deal in the
perspective of an billion dollar business. Overall, this was a valuable learning
experience. It is important in the work place, group setting etc. to share all
the information you have with the other person to make sure you are both on the
same page. In a customer service setting
you need to make sure the customer is happy and if they do not have what they
wanted, a good employee will try to compensate in some other fashion.
You write about a very unhappy customer who was quite angry with you, no doubt. Nonetheless, I don't think the experience matches the prompt very well. This was a one-off situation, not something that was ongoing. And the customer didn't work at the store. Now if some of the other sales people had gotten angry with you for not managing the outburst better because it scared away some of their customers, and if that escalated after that rather than calming down, that would have been conflict a la the prompt.
ReplyDeleteIn other words, sometimes there are unpleasant experiences at work, with customers or with input suppliers. What we are trying to focus on here is such unpleasant experiences with co-workers, bosses, or subordinates, and then when that tension persists for some time. Everyone needs to blow of steam now and then. A quick burst of anger but then a return to normal behavior where all is forgiven is not conflict, in our way of considering it.
Professor,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment. Taking a step back I realize that this one off situation doesn’t really grasp the concept of dealing with conflict with someone you are required to work with. I was fortunate with this situation that everyone was on my side. Another conflict I could have pointed two was the ongoing commission feud I had with one woman in particular. Long story short, every worker obliged to a per customer at a time policy, where each person would only focus on earning one person’s commission until the transaction was complete. However, one woman constantly took laps around the store hording each customer as they entered, even if she was already helping 2 or 3 people. This strategy took commission away from the others operating in a “fair” way. After pleading with the woman to stop this behavior the manager finally reprimanded her by lowering her commission percentage. This conflict was the woman’s fault who failed to play by the rules and reverse incentives were put in place to solve the problem.